• Limpopo

Free Weekly Newsline Every Thursday

SAHPRA Warns ‘Traditional Healers Cannabis Licenses’ Are Illegal

SAHPRA and SAPS have warned that there is no such thing as a ‘Traditional Healers’ Cannabis License’ and that all businesses selling cannabis either through shops or online are operating illegally.

The South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) has again issued a warning that it is illegal to sell cannabis and that the Traditional Healers Act is being misused to justify trading in cannabis.

 

In an (undated) media release late last year, SAHPRA says that SAPS has issued a ‘stern warning’ to the cannabis outlets that have mushroomed across the country that the sale of cannabis is prohibited under current laws, unless it is specifically to medical cannabis patients registered under Section 21 of the Medicines Act.

 

“Some of these illegal businesses, purporting to be operating legally in terms of the Traditional Health Practitioners Act (No. 22 of 2007), are also being sold to members of the public as franchises authorised to deal in cannabis and cannabis-related products” says SAHPRA.

 

“In terms of the Traditional Health Practitioners Act, the definition of “traditional medicine” means an object or substance used in traditional health practice for the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of a physical or mental illness or any curative or therapeutic purpose, including the maintenance or restoration of physical or mental health or well-being in human beings but does not include a dependence-producing or dangerous substance or drug””.

 

“As a result, the Traditional Health Practitioners Act does not create a mechanism to sell cannabis and cannabis- related products that are not exempted in terms of the Medicines Act”.

 

The main proponent of the ‘Traditional Healers Licences’ is the Marijuana Board of South Africa (MBOSA). MBOSA co-founder, Thabo Simon Makwetla, told a Project Indlela webinar on 11 October 2025, that the organization believed it was on firm legal ground in issuing such licenses to its members. MBOSA has been on a provincial recruitment drive, signing up organizations representing traditional healers and legacy cannabis communities, mainly in the Western and Eastern Cape and Gauteng. 

 

MBOSA is part of the Project Indlela initiative to ensure that such communities are catered for in future cannabis legislation. The Cannabis for Private Purposes Act of 2024, which is likely to finally come into effect this year, makes no provision for either traditional growers, legacy communities or private cannabis clubs.

 

Although there is no legal certainty on the status of private clubs, which if properly constituted, are ‘technically not illegal’, these have generally been accepted by law enforcement officials. Such clubs do not ‘sell cannabis’ but allow for member growers, processors and consumers to make cannabis transactions within a ‘closed loop’ that excludes the public and minors. The concept is yet to be tested in law, and, through Project Indlela, the South African Cannabis Club Alliance, is drawing up a recommendation as to how clubs should be catered for in the draft cannabis commercial framework being developed by the DTIC.

 

In the meantime, SAHPRA says that “Dealing in cannabis remains a serious criminal offence in terms of the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act (No 140 of 1992)”


This is an excerpt from the SAHPRA media release:

 

“The definition of dealing is made very clear in the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act, which currently reads (with the words “read in” by the Constitutional Court): “in relation to a drug, includes performing any act in connection with the transhipment, importation, cultivation other than the cultivation of cannabis by an adult in a private place for his or her personal consumption in private, collection, manufacture, supply, prescription, administration, sale, transmission or exportation of the drug”.

 

Cannabis (the whole plant or parts or products thereof) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (the psychoactive substance that gives one a “high”) are currently listed as Schedule 7 substances in terms of the Medicines and Related Substances Act, 1965 (Act 101 of 1965) (the Medicines Act), except when present in processed hemp fibre and products containing not more than 0,1 % of THC in a form not suitable for ingestion, smoking or inhaling purposes; or when present in processed products made from cannabis seed containing not more than 0,001 % of THC; or when used for medicinal purposes.

 

Cannabidiol (CBD) is listed as a Schedule 4 substance. Certain CBD-containing preparations have been excluded from the operation of the Schedules by the Minister of Health for a time-limited period, as per an exclusion notice (R.756) published in Government Gazette No. 42477 on 23 May 2019.

 

CBD-containing preparations for medicinal use are excluded when they contain a maximum daily dose of 20 mg of CBD with an accepted low-risk claim or health claims, without referring to any specific disease.

 

CBD-containing processed products are also excluded when the naturally occurring quantity of CBD and THC contained in the product does not exceed 0,0075 % and 0,001 %, of CBD and THC respectively.

 

Any CBD-containing products that are outside the parameters of the exclusion notice are subject to the provisions of the Schedules and registration as a medicine.

 

Any person who imports or manufactures a CBD-containing medicine in accordance with the exclusion notice must still be in possession of a licence issued in terms of section 22C(1)(b) of the Medicines Act and comply with any relevant standards, including current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) standards. Such persons must be able to present verified assessment by an accredited laboratory of the CBD and/or THC content of any product or medicine when requested.

 

The public is once again reminded of the effect of the Constitutional Court judgment in Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others v Prince: National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others v Rubin: National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others v Acton and Others [2018] SACC 30, handed down on 18 September 2018.

 

The effect of the judgment is that only an adult person (18 years and older) may use, possess or cultivate cannabis in private for his or her personal consumption in private.

 

The use, including smoking, of cannabis in public or in the presence of children or in the presence of non-consenting adult persons is not allowed. The use or possession of cannabis in private other than by an adult for his or her personal consumption is also not permitted.

 

The South African Police Service is mandated to and will act, not only against businesses that sell cannabis illegally, but also against the customers who buy these products.


#

Share this post
The Cannabiz Africa Briefing

One weekly email. Everything moving in African cannabis.

"*" indicates required fields

Name

Search news, companies, regulations

Start typing below to search Cannabiz Africa.